There is much uproar about whether a country can ban a group from its shores based on ideology, religion or nationality. What I said, you’re late to the party — it’s been done already.
People suffer from selective memory, especially if they believe it elevates them on some self-proclaimed platitude of being better than someone else. Let’s put it in context: Donald Trump. As people scream about Trump (who is enunciating a hypothetical policy and speculative political posture — thus words) there is an historical fact that backs him up.
It has been done before — by a ‘progressive democrat.’ It was the well-respected gentleman from Plains, Georgia, the “Peanut Farmer,” James Earle Carter. Get off the floor – I’m not making this up. Facts are facts.
US President Jimmy Carter froze immigration from a Muslim-majority nation in 1979 after the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was overrun and American citizens were taken as hostages and terrorized by their captures.
Carter issued an executive order that all Iranian students in the U.S. had to report to immigration officials within thirty days. As a result of his sole decision 15,000 Iranians who were ejected from the country from a population of 50,000.
Now that’s just damn right un-American, isn’t it? Certainly no court would have allowed it to stand. Think again.
An Appeals Court decision upheld the President’s authority for the action, in part saying this: “The present controversy involving Iranian students in the United States lies in the field of our country’s foreign affairs and implicates matters over which the president has direct constitutional authority.”
There is a nexus to the current situation referred to in Trump’s idea. A concurring opinion in the decision made this point:
“Distinctions on the basis of nationality may be drawn in the immigration field by the Congress or the executive. So long as such distinctions are not wholly irrational, they must be sustained.” The court went to say that Carter’s edict is justified by perceived threats to national security.
History also points out that five months after the hostages were taken, the President imposed formal sanctions against Iran, including closing government offices, prohibiting exports from the U.S. into Iran, seizing domestic Iranian assets…
And, stopping entry by Iranian citizens into the U.S.
Here’s the pertinent line from Carter’s announcement:
“The Secretary of Treasury [State] and the Attorney General will invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.”
The United States has thus banned entry into the country on national security grounds – and under Democratic presidents. None of them are even close to what we call ‘evil.’ In addition to Carter’s freeze of entry into the U.S. for Iranians, FDR certainly imposed restrictions taken against Japanese and Germans.
Here is what people must remember. In the United States domestic policies, national security issues and the legalities of visa restrictions should be debated without vitriol because we should be concerned about the country and its direction. I’m afraid that the screaming and wild denunciations not only chase away civility, but common sense.
You don’t learn unless you listen to other viewpoints. You are a fool if you believe that only your ideas matter. Truth then hides in plain sight. If America has enemies, that’s their key to our destruction.
Trump may not be diabolical or mean, and neither was the “Peanut Farmer.” Their motives are and were spurred by what is seen as unjustifiable events from members of a certain population.
Bernard Alexander McNealy, President
CDM Digital Advertising Agency